Plaintiff a jackpot
winner - finally
Jury awards Montco woman $1 million from casino
Friday, July 14, 2000
By Shannon P. Duffy
With the help of two complete strangers from Brooklyn, A
Montgomery County woman convinced a federal jury on Wednesday
that she was cheated out of a $1 million grand prize she had
rightfully won at the Tropicana Hotel & Casino in Atlantic
City.
Rena Gottlieb, a doctor's wife from Cheltenham, was a member
of Tropicana's "Diamond Club," a free promotion
whose card holding members are entitled to one spin a day
on the casino's "Fun House Million Dollar Wheel."
Gottlieb claimed that when she swiped her Diamond Club card
and spun the wheel on July 24, 1999, the computer game's three
concentric wheels did exactly what every contestant wanted.
The first outside wheel stopped at "advance," prompting
the second wheel to spin, which also stopped at "advance."
And then, Gottlieb claimed, the third, center wheel, with
just six prizes, stopped at the $1 million prize.
Gottlieb claimed that other casino patrons reacted to her
jackpot win but that the casino attendant quickly removed
her card from the machine and swiped another card, causing
the inner wheel to spin again and land on a prize for "show
tickets."
Immediately, Gottlieb complained to the casino management
and later that day filed a complaint with the Casino Control
Commission. Before she walked away, two women from Brooklyn,
NY - Irma Galione and Anna Marie DiMatteo - told her they
had seen her with the $1 million prize and would be willing
to testify if she ever needed them.
When Gottlieb sued in federal court, Tropicana moved to have
the case dismissed, arguing that Gottlieb's story couldn't
be true since her account of the computer's reactions was
simply impossible.
But U.S. District Judge Harvey Bartle III ruled that a jury
should decide since the factual dispute was a credibility
call between the computer experts and the eyewitnesses.
On Wednesday, after a three-day trial, an eight-member federal
jury sided with Gottlieb.
Gottlieb's lawyers, Alan
M. Feldman of Feldman Shepherd Wohlgelernter
& Tanner and solo practitioner Thomas W. Sheridan, said
the jury's verdict was a great vindication for Gottlieb, who
considered the casino's reaction to be an accusation that
she was a liar.
Immediately after the verdict, the casino's insurers agreed
to settle the case for the full $1 million, Sheridan said.
Although the insurer's counsel had been present throughout
the trial, Judge Bartle had decided that the jury should not
be aware that an insurance policy existed, he said.
One of the trial's dramatic moments involved the absence
of a key casino witness - the attendant who allegedly swiped
the second card.
Gottlieb's lawyers were never able to depose the woman because
she was no longer an employee and had moved away from New
Jersey. But during the trial, another casino employee testified
that the woman had returned and spoken with the casino's lawyers.
Sheridan said the judge grew angry and called a sidebar conference
to chastise the defense lawyers for not disclosing that fact
earlier.
But Bartle declined to instruct the jury that it could draw
adverse inferences from the woman's absence. Instead, the
judge said he would simply allow Feldman to make the argument
to the jurors that the woman was begin hidden from them.
|